Journals under Threat: A Joint Response from History of Science, Technology and Medicine Editors
نویسندگان
چکیده
We live in an age of metrics. All around us, things are being standardized, quantified, measured. Scholars concerned with the work of science and technology must regard this as a fascinating and crucial practical, cultural and intellectual phenomenon. Analysis of the roots and meaning of metrics and metrology has been a preoccupation of much of the best work in our field for the past quarter of a century at least. As practitioners of the interconnected disciplines that make up the field of science studies we understand how significant, contingent and uncertain can be the process of rendering nature and society in grades, classes and numbers. We now confront a situation in which our own research is being subjected to putatively precise accountancy by arbitrary and unaccountable agencies. Some may already be aware of the proposed European Reference Index for the Humanities (ERIH), an initiative originating with the European Science Foundation. The ERIH is an attempt to grade journals in the humanities—including ‘history and philosophy of science’. The initiative proposes a league table of academic journals, with premier, second and third divisions. According to the European Science Foundation, ERIH ‘aims initially to identify, and gain more visibility for, top-quality European Humanities research published in academic journals in, potentially, all European languages’. It is hoped ‘that ERIH will form the backbone of a fully-fledged research information system for the Humanities’. What is meant, however, is that ERIH will provide funding bodies and other agencies in Europe and elsewhere with an allegedly exact measure of research quality. In short, if research is published in a premier league journal it will be recognized as first rate; if it appears somewhere in the lower divisions, it will be rated (and not funded) accordingly. This initiative is entirely defective in conception and execution. Consider the major issues of accountability and transparency. The process of producing the graded list of journals in science studies was overseen by a committee of four (the present membership is listed at http://www.esf.org/research-areas/humanities/research-infrastructures-including-erih/ erih-governance-and-panels/erih-expert-panels.html). This committee cannot be considered representative. It was not selected in consultation with any of the various disciplinary organizations that currently represent our field such as the European Association for the History of Medicine and Health, the Society for the Social History of Medicine, the British Society for the History of Science, the History of Science Society, the Philosophy of Science Association, the Society for the History of Technology or the Society for Social Studies of Science. Journal editors were only belatedly informed of the process and its relevant criteria
منابع مشابه
Proceedings of Second International conference on Medical Writing held at Ajman, UAE (March 5-7, 2015)
Ajman (UAE): Center for Diabetes Education (EDC) in collaboration with World Association of Medical Editors (WAME), European Medical Writers Association (EPWA) and Eastern Mediterranean Association of Medical Editors (EMAME) organized a two day international conference on Medical Writing here from March 5-7, 2015. Mr. Tom Lang from USA a distinguished Medical Writer was the first speaker in the...
متن کاملStrategies to curb young researchers from predatory publishers
This letter addresses the current scenario ofpredatory publishers in the medical fieldand strategies to curb young researchers frompredatory publishing. Today, the increasingtrend and magnitude of predatory publishershave proposed a big challenge to youngresearchers in the medical field (1). Predatorypublishers are publishers which publish paperswith questionable peer review, charge enormouspub...
متن کاملCombating editorial racism in psychiatric publications.
Most readers of this journal will know something about global inequalities but something about global inequalities but may not fully realise their extent. The use-may not fully realise their extent. The useful reminder is the 'nine to one' rule: 90% ful reminder is the 'nine to one' rule: 90% of health resources are consumed by 10% of health resources are consumed by 10% of the richest countrie...
متن کاملA joint pricing-network design model for a resilient closed-loop supply chain under quantity discount
In this paper, a novel resilient multi-echelon closed-loop location-allocation-inventory problem (RMCLIP) is addressed that optimizes strategic and tactical decisions simultaneously. In order to represent the purchasing cost of raw material from the supplier, a pricing model under quantity discounts is employed in the closed-loop supply chain (CLSC). Considering the capability of returning the ...
متن کاملبررسی دیدگاههای سردبیران مجلات علوم پزشکی ایران در مورد استانداردهای انتشار تحقیقات پزشکی
Background: Medical journal editors have impressible role in the publishing process. In the present study we have surveyed the attitudes and knowledge of Iranian medical journal editors towards standards of published medical research. Materials and methods: 51 editors of registered journals were invited, where 27 have taken part. A self-directed questionnaire according to the Vancouver group g...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Medical History
دوره 53 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009